Florida court rules 16-year-old is not ‘mature’ enough to get an abortion – National
An appeals court in Florida has upheld a decision by a circuit judge to block a “parentless” 16-year-old from having an abortion, ruling she is not “mature” enough to end a pregnancy.
The teen was seeking a court waiver to terminate her pregnancy, meaning she wanted to be able to have the procedure done without the written consent of a parent or guardian. Circuit Court Judge Jennifer J. Frydrychowicz, a registered Republican, first denied the bypass, reports CBS News, and three judges of the First District Court of Appeal denied her appeal.
In the ruling, the court decided she did not present “clear and convincing evidence that she was sufficiently mature to decide whether to terminate her pregnancy.”
States move quickly to ban abortion after Roe v. Wade. Here’s what access will look like
The ruling, which was published online, also said that while the teen has no parents, she does have a legal guardian. She is currently pursuing her GED and participating in a program for young women “who have experienced trauma in their lives by providing educational support and counseling.”
In her petition to obtain an abortion, the girl argued that she “is not ready to have a baby,” doesn’t have a job, is “still in school,” and that the father is unable to assist her, reports NBC News.
According to Fox8, the pregnant girl said in her petition that her appointed guardian “is fine with what she wants to do.”
Could Canadian doctors face legal issues providing abortion services to Americans?
The appeals court said if that guardian “consents to the minor’s termination of her pregnancy, all that is required is a written waiver from the guardian.”
The appeals court also wrote that it appeared the trial court wanted to give the teen “additional time” to consider her decision.
“Reading between the lines, it appears that the trial court wanted to give the minor, who was under extra stress due to a friend’s death, additional time to express a keener understanding of the consequences of terminating a pregnancy,” the judges ruled. “This makes some sense given that the minor, at least at one point, says she was open to having a child, but later changed her view after considering her inability to care for a child in her current station in life.”
Here’s what you need to know about online privacy in a post-Roe world
One of the ruling judges, Scott Makar, wrote that he only partially concurred with the ruling from the other two judges.
In the court’s decision, he wrote that the teen had displayed maturity and noted that she explained that she’s “not ready to have a baby.”
He also noted that Frydrychowicz had left her decision open-ended, with the potential for the teen to ask for a bypass “at a later date.”
“Given the open-ended nature of the order reflecting the trial judge’s willingness to hear from the minor again – and the time pressures presented – I would remand the case to the trial court,” Makar wrote.
Majority of Canadians support abortion access, Ipsos poll finds
The other two judges, Harvey L. Jay III and Rachel E. Nordby, ruled that sending the case back to the trial court was not necessary.
News of the ruling spread quickly, with many politicians questioning the court’s decision.
Florida senate minority leader Lauren Book said it was “unconscionable” to sentence the girl “to continue an unwanted pregnancy after she stated she was not ready to have a baby, was pursuing her education, didn’t have a job, and the father was unable to assist her.”
Congresswoman Diana DeGette asked: “But she’s mature enough to raise a child instead?”
If the teen decides to take her case back to trial court, however, she may be running out of time. At her previous appearance in trial court earlier this month, the judge determined she was approximately 10 weeks along in her pregnancy. In April, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed into law legislation that bans abortion after 15 weeks.
© 2022 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.